oPossum 1,083 Posted June 1, 2011 Author Share Posted June 1, 2011 I think you're all nuts here. This isn't 1965's mission to moon with 70k of memory, just use 2553.Just kidding Yeah, sorry Rob. I got caught up in oPossum's "this code is optimal (can not be done with fewer instruction words or cycles)" claim, which sounded like a challenge to me (grin). Thanks for taking up the challenge. You got me to take another look at optimizing the code. I really like assembly language on PIC devices so I thought it might be fun to learn assembly language on the MSP430 value line devices. So far, the von Neumann architecture on the MSP430 is proving difficult (for me), compared to the Harvard architecture on the PIC. I have been programming PIC in assembly for about 20 years. Just learning the TMS430. I like it, but miss the btfss, btfsc, bsf, bcf, and btf instructions that the PIC has. CCS is a bit unstable and slow, I like MPLAB better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.