Jump to content
43oh

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Soldered up a new board. Works like a charm, unfortunately I don't know actually have any target boards to use this with, as it's a different pinout.     Fuse is a 1206 footprint, but I ordered 0

I recently built my own ezFET lite based of the files that TI have made available.   Update 9/06: Works "kinda" as expected. Board disconnects from USB when a target board is attached and is bei

@@zeke I've added this to the silk on one of my new boards, Guess I'll see how it turns out.   Feels like there is too much free space in the clock.

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks.

 

I wonder if it would be worth looking into the code to see if it could be shrunk down while still being compatible with the tilib standard.

Currently the MSP430F5528 is the most expensive part, at ~$10 ea. in single quantities.

 

Especially if you only wanted program functionality, ie remove debugging, which makes sense for most tag-connect applications. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

I wonder if it would be worth looking into the code to see if it could be shrunk down while still being compatible with the tilib standard.

Currently the MSP430F5528 is the most expensive part, at ~$10 ea. in single quantities.

 

Especially if you only wanted program functionality, ie remove debugging, which makes sense for most tag-connect applications. 

 

Yes, it should be possible to shrink it down, also without removing debugging part. There are lots of inlining, and code itself is not optimized regarding speed / size. At the end it should fit to USB entry level, low cost, 32KB MSP430F550x device.

 

If code is customized, will not be big problem to add fuse blow, also for MSP430x2xx devices (with additional hardware part, few extra $). And digitally controlled regulator (0 extra $).

 

My plan was to done it (before MSP430F5529 LP was published, better / low cost version of FET430 UIF) by myself, but now working on my own flasher, so there is no motivation / free time for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is there also a MSP430F5516 which cuts both feature sets from the design while still possible? :)

 

No :( I guess there are already enough options.

post-274-0-45975300-1404744641_thumb.png

 

Also I'd like to note that, while the code should be 100% compatible with the MSP430F5529, it is a larger device, and is not hardware compatible with the boards I've designed.

 

Part of deciphering the F55[1/2]x model number:

The last digit has to be even to be the smaller 64pin QFN. if it's odd then you get more I/O pins and a bigger 80-pin package.

 

 

Also the hardware connects VCC and VUSB via voltage dividers to ADC channels 0/1, but since the voltage cannot be changed ADC could be removed entirely. if the PC polls for the voltage just return a fixed value.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Yes, of course.

 

That's their whole purpose. :)

 

They both work fine as debuggers/programmers in everything compatible with the tilib FET driver. CCS, mspdebug, mspflasher etc.

 

Thanks for the update.

 

Which MCU did you settle for in the end? What's the bare minimum required to get this board to work?

 

Do you have plans to put the design up on the store or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...