elpaso 15 Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 Hi, I've got the new chronos for my birthday, nice present Now I would like to start hacking it by compiling a custom firmware, I use gcc and Linux and proprietary software is not an option for me. I've downloaded and successfully compiled openchronos and openchronos-ng but I'm completely confused about which of the two is the most up-to-date and the preferred starting point. Apparently, the ng fork is more recent, but somewhere in Google group I've read that it has just a fraction of the features that are in (original) openchronos, it doesn't seem to me: make config shows more options in the ng branch. On the other end, openchronos-ng doesn't compile out of the box if you don't disable accelerometer because that module is not yet ported. To make things even more complicated, there are a dozen or more forks here and there (github, gitorius, sf etc.) and it's difficult to understand where to start. Is there anybody out there willing to coordinate efforts a little bit? It seems to me a complete waste of programming resources if everybody forks and there is not a well defined master repository. Any hint? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
elpaso 15 Posted November 28, 2013 Author Share Posted November 28, 2013 Ok, I did start and wrote a few notes for those who are willing to start hacking this watch under Linux: http://www.itopen.it/2013/11/28/the-hackable-watch-a-wearable-msp430-mcu/ Comments, corrections and suggestions are always welcome! bluehash 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bluehash 1,581 Posted November 30, 2013 Share Posted November 30, 2013 Thanks! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
petertux 40 Posted December 2, 2013 Share Posted December 2, 2013 I've got the new chronos for my birthday, nice present Now I would like to start hacking it by compiling a custom firmware, I use gcc and Linux and proprietary software is not an option for me. I've downloaded and successfully compiled openchronos and openchronos-ng but I'm completely confused about which of the two is the most up-to-date and the preferred starting point. happy birthday regarding your question, it depends of what you intend to do. 'openchronos' is more in line with the original sourcecode, they patched the original code to compile with mspgcc. complete with SimpliciTI stack for wireless comms. the bluerobin stuff was dropped due to too much blobbiness. 'openchronos-ng' is more of a complete rewrite, it's much more modularized which makes the code much easier to understand and to tweak by users. the only problem is that not all of the features were ported. there is no SimpliciTI in this fork, but you can switch to the 'swap' git branch that includes code for the swap stack [1] if you need to talk to the outside world. so if you want to slightly tweak the original code go with the first one, however if you want to implement new ideas definitely go with '-ng'. [1] http://code.google.com/p/panstamp/wiki/SWAPchronos elpaso 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
elpaso 15 Posted December 2, 2013 Author Share Posted December 2, 2013 happy birthday ;-) regarding your question, it depends of what you intend to do. 'openchronos' is more in line with the original sourcecode, they patched the original code to compile with mspgcc. complete with SimpliciTI stack for wireless comms. the bluerobin stuff was dropped due to too much blobbiness. 'openchronos-ng' is more of a complete rewrite, it's much more modularized which makes the code much easier to understand and to tweak by users. the only problem is that not all of the features were ported. there is no SimpliciTI in this fork, but you can switch to the 'swap' git branch that includes code for the swap stack [1] if you need to talk to the outside world. so if you want to slightly tweak the original code go with the first one, however if you want to implement new ideas definitely go with '-ng'. [1] http://code.google.com/p/panstamp/wiki/SWAPchronos Thanks for the wishes and for the clarifications, I've already started with "ng", I like the modules system, it makes it really easy to add a new module. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Automate 69 Posted December 3, 2013 Share Posted December 3, 2013 Congrats, you made DP. http://dangerousprototypes.com/2013/12/03/ti-ez430-chronos-watch-getting-started-on-custom-firmwares/ elpaso 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
elpaso 15 Posted December 4, 2013 Author Share Posted December 4, 2013 Thanks! This explains why my site was so slow yesterday ;-) BTW, In the meantime I've also added a short Hello World tutorial: http://www.itopen.it/2013/11/29/openchronos-hello-world-tutorial/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.