Jump to content
43oh

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Has anyone considered using this as a audio frequency waveform generator? It would seem like it would make a nice little instrument for the bench, one could use the cap touch-pad to dial in the freque

I did the test and substituted the bootimg.bin on the SD with the one from the audio connected framework and it works. The board is then recognized as a USB audio i/o device with audio processing. N

It seems TI have just produced an audio / capacitive touch booster pack. On special at $30 for a while, then up to $35. Ideal if you want to make your own iPod I suppose.

Posted Images

Acccchhh! I've been soldering BGA's with a paint stripping heat gun ever since you were a weeeeee lad!

accent>

 

BGA's ain't no big thing. Just need to lay out a PCB that has tons of test points on it. ;)

 

The other situation where BGA's are untrustworthy are high vibration environments. It the PCB thickness isn't generous then the BGA could self-disassemble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acccchhh! I've been soldering BGA's with a paint stripping heat gun ever since you were a weeeeee lad!

accent>

 

BGA's ain't no big thing. Just need to lay out a PCB that has tons of test points on it. ;)

 

The other situation where BGA's are untrustworthy are high vibration environments. It the PCB thickness isn't generous then the BGA could self-disassemble.

 

And high heat applications... Like Laptops or Video Cards (or video cards in laptops). And you really need a xray machine to see if the solder properly melted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this booster pack veeeery strange. You have a powerful DSP which does nothing but MP3 en-/decoding and thus should have a lot of spare processing power. Then you connect a MSP430 for the UI, which tells the DSP what to do, going so far that the OLED is connected to the DSP, but you control it's contents via the MSP...

 

Overall, this is a very complicated design which has no relevancy in real life. I guess this might be a fun thing to play with, but a multi processor design where none is needed is always a bad idea.

 

Still: if it had at least an integrated XDS100 emulator, this would be a very cool deal to get started with C55x DSPs. But since the schematics aren't online yet, I'm not even sure if you could connect an external emulator to the DSP.

 

Cheers

TomKraut

Link to post
Share on other sites
I find this booster pack veeeery strange. You have a powerful DSP which does nothing but MP3 en-/decoding and thus should have a lot of spare processing power. Then you connect a MSP430 for the UI, which tells the DSP what to do, going so far that the OLED is connected to the DSP, but you control it's contents via the MSP...

 

Yeah, I thought that as well. But as I never worked with the C5000s, I thought that just maybe there might be a valid reason for doing this. The only thing the MSP430 does, which the DSP might not do as easily is the capacitive touch.

 

This kinda reminds me that I need to get some time to play with the C5000s (and of course some HW) :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
I find this booster pack veeeery strange. You have a powerful DSP which does nothing but MP3 en-/decoding and thus should have a lot of spare processing power. Then you connect a MSP430 for the UI, which tells the DSP what to do, going so far that the OLED is connected to the DSP, but you control it's contents via the MSP...

 

Overall, this is a very complicated design which has no relevancy in real life. I guess this might be a fun thing to play with, but a multi processor design where none is needed is always a bad idea.

 

Still: if it had at least an integrated XDS100 emulator, this would be a very cool deal to get started with C55x DSPs. But since the schematics aren't online yet, I'm not even sure if you could connect an external emulator to the DSP.

 

Cheers

TomKraut

 

Demonstrates Implementation in existing projects without needing to port over code? Demonstrates availability for hobbyists who wouldn't be able to work with the more complicated aspects of a DSP like bootloading, or who don't have access to more expensive development tools?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Schematics are online now. The JTAG port is completely exposed on a non populated header (easily fixed ;-) ), so this has suddenly become veeery interesting :D

 

One could either connect a LP + XDS100v2 emulator board, or one could build a board which supplies power to the booster pack and has an integrated XDS100 (but no MSP430).

 

Cheers

TomKraut

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...