Jump to content

wasson65

Members
  • Content Count

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About wasson65

  • Rank
    Level 1
  • Birthday 04/16/1968

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Houston/Dallas
  • Interests
    Robotics, sailing, vinyl, vacuum tubes, cars
  1. wasson65

    MSP430 and Java?

    Great read, if you think java sucks. I enjoyed it immensely!!
  2. wasson65

    MSP430 and Java?

    There are obviously a lot of feelings around Java, and it's not hard to see the two camps that we've split into here. So here's my conclusion on the entire thing: If you want to learn Java then just write Java and run it on something that makes sense. MSP430's and Java don't make sense. The wonderful, excellent, most helpful super great parts of Java really won't help you at all in a micro, and the not-completely-great bloated parts will make life miserable, where the idea is to be close to the hardware instead of completely abstracted away from it. And (IMHO) once you've endured the misery, you'll have experience that is more or less as useless in the embedded world as it is in the corporate application world.... Or maybe I'm just a grouch....
  3. wasson65

    MSP430 and Java?

    I've written in my fair share of languages. I don't think it so much that the problem is with how java got done, I think the problem is with the mindset behind java. To me, this essay sums it up pretty well: http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html
  4. wasson65

    Greetings from Omaha,NE

    The closeness to the hardware is a different experience. If you try some assembly language you can really get a flavor for the silicon and the designers point of view. Welcome aboard!
  5. wasson65

    Your last beer

    Sorry, hit the button too soon. Yeah, brisket and crawfish are my two favorite adopted delicacies... I wasn't born here but I got here eventually. "I'm from Texas, what country are you from?"
  6. wasson65

    Your last beer

  7. wasson65

    Your last beer

    Ziegen Bock Amber at Rudy's BBQ
  8. wasson65

    Quadcopter BoosterPack

    I was trying to get at something a little different - that there are people with quads already, who might switch out their motor driver board for this one if they knew they could easily 'switch brains' with it. For those people, buying another frame and set of motors isn't strictly necessary. Just a thought.
  9. wasson65

    Quadcopter BoosterPack

    I think you should consider selling the populated PCB separately - there are a lot of quads out there already, and if I had one and could swap out the brains for ~$75, that's an option I would find more interesting than an entire second copter. Obviously I don't know what your BOM is and how the costs split out, but I suspect the board and it's parts are not the lions share of the cost, but I could be wrong - hard to believe, I know, but it has happened! Plus it gives people a way to buy it in smaller pieces that don't attract the attention of spousal units as much....
  10. wasson65

    Hello from Dallas

    I haven't played much with serial output from the '430 to the outside world, so I'm going to have to defer to someone else, although it seems to me that there is a bit more to getting serial into a normal PC than what you have described. Here is another thread that discusses getting directly from '430 to PC: http://forum.43oh.com/topic/1156-communicate-with-pc/ It says you need a device like this: https://www.sparkfun.com/products/718 Hope this helps!
  11. What they are getting at is that the power supply will happily and safely supply 3.4 volts at waaaay more amps that it would take to melt wires if something gets shorted on the breadboard. A simple 2 to 5 amp fuse inline with the 3.4 volts would also do the trick I'd think.
  12. wasson65

    Houston Robot Project Underway

    Worked on the 'navigation table' for Henry last night. The idea is basically that you can put an entry into a table in RAM that will have call a routine at a given number of 'tics' from now, where a tic is some time period that you find relevant. Once the tics counts down to zero, the routine is called and that section of the table can be re-used. When avoidance movements need to be performed, the existing table entries will have their 'tics' counters bumped up to compensate for the time to perform the avoidance movement. This is going to be my general approach to sequencing, as it's the easiest way I can come up with to allow multiple subsystems to have their own 'state machine', and still account for unexpected inputs which may need to affect the state timing of other subsystems. There's more of a write up on my blog. Hope to have obstacle avoidance working by the end of the week.
  13. wasson65

    SLAMbot: TI Evalbot + XV-11 LIDAR

    That's great stuff Sergi!!! I'm on the robotics side of the house as well, and you've got an excellent project going! I look forward to updates.
  14. wasson65

    Hello from Dallas

    It's super easy. Just mount a socket on your board, be sure to put a pull-up resistor on the reset pin. 47k if memory serves. Program the part on the launchpad, and pop it into your board. TaDAA! Finished. The '430's are great that way. You can also use the launchpad to program your chip on your board. If you search for 'in circuit programming' you should find stuff here. Welcome aboard! Let us know how we can help.
  15. You're well within 10 percent of 3.3, I wouldn't worry at all. Love the trainer, it looks like it would make tinkering around an absolute pleasure. Nicer tools make a difference... Did you route the USB through the trainer or will the host connect normally to the launchpad?
×